Ideal and Non-ideal Theory in Elizabeth Anderson's The Imperative of Integration

Benjamin R. Hertzberg

Political Studies Review, 2014, vol. 12, issue 3, 369-375

Abstract: type="main">

Elizabeth Anderson's The Imperative of Integration is most notable for its creative application of her conception of non-ideal theory. I assess Anderson's conception and argue that it does not adequately account for the necessary role of political ideals in non-ideal theory. Political ideals, I argue, determine what counts as a political problem and shape the practice of non-ideal theorizing in ways Anderson does not fully address. This methodological difference leads me to depart in a small but significant way from her criticism of the color-blind ideal: by failing to consider the role of ideals in defining political problems, Anderson's criticisms of the color-blind ideal fail to note the contradiction advocates of that ideal find between the critical implications of their view and its alleged policy prescriptions.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1478-9302.12062 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:12:y:2014:i:3:p:369-375

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1478-9299

Access Statistics for this article

Political Studies Review is currently edited by Matthew Festenstein and Martin Smith

More articles in Political Studies Review from Political Studies Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().