Foreign Aid and Recurrent Cost: Donor Competition, Aid Proliferation, and Budget Support
Yutaka Arimoto and
Hisaki Kono ()
Review of Development Economics, 2009, vol. 13, issue 2, 276-287
Recent empirical studies reveal that effectiveness of aid on growth is ambiguous. The authors consider aid proliferation—excess aid investment relative to recurrent cost—as a potential cause that undermines aid effectiveness, because aid projects can only produce sustainable benefits when sufficient recurrent costs are disbursed. They consider the donor's budget support as a device to supplement the shortage of the recipient's recurrent cost and to alleviate the misallocation of inputs. However, when donors have self‐interested preferences for the success of their own projects over those conducted by others, they provide insufficient budget support relative to aid, which results in aid proliferation. Moreover, aid proliferation is shown to be worsened by the presence of more donors.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Foreign Aid and Recurrent Cost: Donor Competition, Aid Proliferation and Budget Support (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:13:y:2009:i:2:p:276-287
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1363-6669
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Development Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi
More articles in Review of Development Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().