Using Quality of Interview Information to Assess Nonrandom Attrition Bias in Developing‐Country Panel Data

John Maluccio

Review of Development Economics, 2004, vol. 8, issue 1, 91-109

Abstract: Panel data often provide an understanding of household behavior not possible with cross‐sectional information alone. However, a disturbing feature of such data is that there can be substantial, nonrandom attrition and many analysts share the concern that this inhibits the ability to make accurate inferences. The author examines attrition in the KwaZulu–Natal Income Dynamics Study 1993–1998, assesses the extent of attrition bias for a specific empirical example, and proposes and implements a selection correction methodology using quality of first round interview variables as identifying instruments. The results show that attrition does lead to statistical bias in the “behavioral” coefficients in estimation of household‐level expenditure functions. Since it is typically difficult to determine the bias for a particular analysis a priori, and such bias is by its nature model‐specific, it behooves researchers using panel data to evaluate the effects of attrition in their analyses.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (36)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2004.00222.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:91-109

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1363-6669

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Development Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi

More articles in Review of Development Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().