 HOW MISLEADING ARE INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS?Vladimir Stoikov Review of Income and Wealth, 1975, vol. 21, issue 2, 239-250 Abstract: Starting from the proposition that economic welfare is better measured by the capitalized value of expected future income at age 18 than by income at a point of time, the present paper explores the bias introduced in comparison of earnings and income distributions. The earning distribution chosen for study is that for males in 1959 in the United States. It is shown that earnings distributions are biased and therfore can be considered highly misleading in most comparisons unless the comparison involves two groups with identical age distributions and identical distributions of earnings over the working life of earners. Further, a most striking effect can be discerned in comparing the earnings to the present value distributions by educational level. As one moves up the educational ladder, the within‐group distribution of lifetime income becomes more and more equal, in sharp contrast to the findings for the distribution of earnings at a point in time. The result are sufficiently interesting and striking to warrant further studies of distributions of present value of lifetime expected earnings (and income). Date: 1975 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revinw:v:21:y:1975:i:2:p:239-250 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Review of Income and Wealth is currently edited by Conchita D'Ambrosio and Robert J. Hill More articles in Review of Income and Wealth from International Association for Research in Income and Wealth Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.