DISPUTING AND REGULATORY POLICY: THE EXAMPLE OF A STATE PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCY
Richard A. Brisbin and
Susan Hunter
Review of Policy Research, 1990, vol. 10, issue 1, 41-61
Abstract:
The literature on policy making has largely ignored the formulation and implementation of policy when governmental agencies process citizen disputes. In this essay we provide an initial exploration of the dimensions of agency policy making and policy implementation during dispute processing. Using a case study of dispute processing by a state public utilities regulatory agency, it appears that dispute processing contributes to evolutionary policy formulation and implementation by providing a context for the incremental adjustment and legitimation of continuing policies, by sponsoring negotiations leading to the serial adaption of existing policies to new circumstances, and by screening disputes and sharpening the issues in disputes so they are amenable to policy development through agency adjudicatory procedures. The findings of the case study suggest that processing of citizen complaints flowing into the “bottom” of an agency is potentially as important as the politics of the rule making and licensing procedural contexts in the conduct of regulatory policy.
Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb00065.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revpol:v:10:y:1990:i:1:p:41-61
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.wiley.com/bw/subs.asp?ref=1541-132x
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Policy Research is currently edited by Christopher Gore
More articles in Review of Policy Research from Policy Studies Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().