 SEPARATING ANALYSIS FROM POLITICSAnthony Patt Review of Policy Research, 1999, vol. 16, issue 3‐4, 104-137 Abstract: Over the last twenty years, policy‐makers in Europe have attempted to solve the problem of acid rain using detailed analysis grounded in natural science and economics. The results are impressive, as Europeans have successfully implemented a number of international agreements to reduce pollution emissions, agreements that in theory achieve the greatest environmental benefit at the lowest aggregate cost across Europe. This article examines the analysis on which these policies were based. First, it finds a pattern of investigating the use of cost‐benefit analysis, together with a lack of usefulness associated with the actual results of such analysis. Second, it finds that the analytic framework that came to replace cost‐ benefit analysis—“critical loads”—contained many of the same uncertainties and political decisions that plagued cost‐benefit analysis. Nevertheless, “critical loads” analysis was seen as less value‐laden and more reliable, and contributed significantly to policy development. Desire for rapid action led policy‐makers to ignore or overlook the politics and uncertainties inherent in efforts at scientific assessment and modeling. Date: 1999 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revpol:v:16:y:1999:i:3-4:p:104-137 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Review of Policy Research is currently edited by Christopher Gore More articles in Review of Policy Research from Policy Studies Organization Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.