The Policy Sciences and the Unmasking Turn of Mind1

Philip Ryan

Review of Policy Research, 2004, vol. 21, issue 5, 715-728

Abstract: To unmask an idea is to disarm it by claiming that it has been advanced in the service of unacknowledged motives, bypassing the question of whether the idea is true or false. Most of us engage in the occasional unmasking of policy arguments. But unmasking becomes problematic when it is a “turn of mind,” a standard tool applied to a wide range of arguments, as in the work of policy writers Deborah Stone and William Riker. This article argues that the unmasking turn of mind misunderstands the world of policy and politics, and poses risks to a society's practice of deliberation on policy matters. Guidelines for responsible unmasking are proposed.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00103.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revpol:v:21:y:2004:i:5:p:715-728

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.wiley.com/bw/subs.asp?ref=1541-132x

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Policy Research is currently edited by Christopher Gore

More articles in Review of Policy Research from Policy Studies Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().