POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR EMPLOYERS OF SOCIAL SECURITY “PRIVATIZATION:” POLICY RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS

Kelly A. Olsen and Jack L. Vanderhei

Risk Management and Insurance Review, 1997, vol. 1, issue 1, 32-50

Abstract: Abstract: While traditional fixes to restore Social Security to actuarial balance have known consequences for employers, opinion polls show strong public support for nontraditional approaches, e.g., the stock market investment of Social Security funds (privatization). The authors examine some of the complex assumptions which have been raised as the basis for determining if privitization would benefit employers and discuss the lack of research available to support or dispute the validity of some of these assumptions.

Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.1997.tb00062.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:1:y:1997:i:1:p:32-50

Access Statistics for this article

Risk Management and Insurance Review is currently edited by Mary A. Weiss

More articles in Risk Management and Insurance Review from American Risk and Insurance Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().