Pay Growth, Fairness, and Job Satisfaction: Implications for Nominal and Real Wage Rigidity

Jennifer Smith ()

Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2015, vol. 117, issue 3, 852-877

Abstract: Theories of wage rigidity often rely on a positive relationship between pay changes and utility, arising from concern for fairness or gift exchange. Supportive evidence has emerged from laboratory experiments, but the link has not yet been established with field data. This paper contributes a first step, using representative British data. Workers care about the level and the growth of earnings. Below-median wage increases lead to an insult effect, except when similar workers have real wage reductions or when firm production is falling. Nominal pay cuts appear to be insulting even when the firm is doing badly.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/sjoe.12091 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Pay Growth, Fairness and Job Satisfaction: Implications for Nominal and Real Wage Rigidity (2013)
Working Paper: Pay Growth, Fairness and Job Satisfaction: Implications for Nominal and Real Wage Rigidity (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scandj:v:117:y:2015:i:3:p:852-877

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0347-0520

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Journal of Economics is currently edited by Richard Friberg, Matti Liski and Kjetil Storesletten

More articles in Scandinavian Journal of Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().