Novel criteria to exclude the surrogate paradox and their optimalities

Yunjian Yin, Lan Liu, Zhi Geng and Peng Luo

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2020, vol. 47, issue 1, 84-103

Abstract: When the primary outcome is hard to collect, a surrogate endpoint is typically used as a substitute. However, even when a treatment has a positive average causal effect (ACE) on a surrogate endpoint, which also has a positive ACE on the primary outcome, it is still possible that the treatment has a negative ACE on the primary outcome. Such a phenomenon is called the surrogate paradox and greatly challenges the use of surrogates. In this paper, we provide criteria to exclude the surrogate paradox. Our criteria are optimal in the sense that they are sufficient and “almost necessary” to exclude the paradox: If the conditions are satisfied, the surrogate paradox is guaranteed to be absent, whereas if the conditions fail, there exists a data‐generating process with surrogate paradox that can generate the same observed data. That is, our criteria capture all the observed information to exclude the surrogate paradox.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12398

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:84-103

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0303-6898

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics is currently edited by ÿrnulf Borgan and Bo Lindqvist

More articles in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics from Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics, Finnish Statistical Society, Norwegian Statistical Association, Swedish Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().