Earnings over the Life Cycle: What Do Human Capital Models Explain?
Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1995, vol. 42, issue 3, 267-89
It is argued that labor market success is perhaps the most important indicator of individual welfare. As such, this paper surveys recent developments in human capital theory to explain how earnings vary across the population. The paper begins with standard life cycle accumulation models which explain why earnings rise at a diminishing rate over one's life cycle. These models are then modified to incorporate (1) school quality to explain race differences in earnings, (2) intermittent labor force participation to explain gender wage differentials, (3) heterogeneous human capital to explain occupational choice, (4) matching to explain geographic and job mobility, and (5) search to explain workers' and firms' incomplete information. Finally, additional extensions are considered to incorporate effort enhancing contracts as a special case. Copyright 1995 by Scottish Economic Society.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:42:y:1995:i:3:p:267-89
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0036-9292
Access Statistics for this article
Scottish Journal of Political Economy is currently edited by Tim Barmby, Andrew Hughes-Hallett and Campbell Leith
More articles in Scottish Journal of Political Economy from Scottish Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().