Making Britain More Competitive: A Critique of Regulation and Competition policy

Dieter Helm

Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2001, vol. 48, issue 5, 471-487

Abstract: The paper provides a critique of the Labour government’s attempts to make Britain more competitive by reforming regulation and competition policy. It is argued that the Utilities Act (2000) has not reduced the cost of capital, but rather the discretionary powers of the regulators have been generalised further, augmented by government guidelines covering additional social and environmental objectives. The paper reviews the impact of the windfall tax, the use of private balance sheets as a private–sector borrowing requirement, and the growing costs of regulation. The Competition Act (1998) has concentrated on conduct rather than structure, and the paper argues that the neglect of structural change to create competition, rather than merely sustain it, reduces the scope for enhancing productivity and hence the competitive position of the economy.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.00210

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:48:y:2001:i:5:p:471-487

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0036-9292

Access Statistics for this article

Scottish Journal of Political Economy is currently edited by Tim Barmby, Andrew Hughes-Hallett and Campbell Leith

More articles in Scottish Journal of Political Economy from Scottish Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().