Green national accounting for welfare and sustainability:A Taxonomy Of Assumptions And Results
Geir Asheim ()
Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2003, vol. 50, issue 2, 113-130
This paper summarizes assumptions made and results obtained in parts of the literature on welfare and sustainability accounting. I consider five different assumptions that can be imposed independently of each other, producing 32 different combinations. This taxonomy is used to organize results in welfare and sustainability accounting. The analysis illustrates how stronger results require stronger assumptions and thereby impose harder informational requirements. Copyright (c) Scottish Economic Society 2003.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (15) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2003&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Green national accounting for welfare and sustainability: A taxonomy of assumptions and results (2003)
Working Paper: Green National Accounting for Welfare and Sustainability: A Taxonomy of Assumptions and Results (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:50:y:2003:i:2:p:113-130
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0036-9292
Access Statistics for this article
Scottish Journal of Political Economy is currently edited by Tim Barmby, Andrew Hughes-Hallett and Campbell Leith
More articles in Scottish Journal of Political Economy from Scottish Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().