SCIENCE‐BASED R&D IN SCHUMPETERIAN GROWTH
Guido Cozzi and
Silvia Galli ()
Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2009, vol. 56, issue 4, 474-491
Abstract:
Firm success is often associated with the development of better products. Private firms undertake applied R&D seeking market advantage, by capitalizing on the freely accessible results of basic research. But unpatentable basic research often fails to address applied R&D open problems. What is the role of the incentives in improving the innovative performance of an economy by matching partially motivated public researchers to their mission? Sometimes government‐funded research projects are mission‐directed, and yet in many cases the public sector academics indulge in carrier‐driven research. An innovation system where, as in the United States, basic research is also driven by patents implicitly sets an ex‐post incentive to the researchers guided by invisible hand. For a public innovation system – like the European one – designing an incentive scheme to motivate public researchers is of key importance for fostering the performance of the economic system. This paper extends the Schumpeterian multisector growth model with vertical innovation by highlighting a link between the degree of ‘targetness’ of public research and aggregate innovation. A positive effect of social capital is also proved.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00494.x
Related works:
Working Paper: Science-Based R&D in Schumpeterian Growth (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:56:y:2009:i:4:p:474-491
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0036-9292
Access Statistics for this article
Scottish Journal of Political Economy is currently edited by Tim Barmby, Andrew Hughes-Hallett and Campbell Leith
More articles in Scottish Journal of Political Economy from Scottish Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().