Systems Thinking: Common Ground or Untapped Territory?

Pamela Buckle Henning and Wan‐Ching Chen

Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2012, vol. 29, issue 5, 470-483

Abstract: At international gatherings of systems scholars, the term ‘systems thinking’ elicits understanding nods and smiles. Such thinking, it would appear, is a way this largely academic community works ‘all together now’, thinking in a systemic way about our varied areas of inquiry. But how common is this understanding among us? Assessing the degree to which we work ‘all together now’ requires recognizing the different assumptions we make about what systems thinking means. So powerful is systems thinking's capacity to holistically address twenty‐first‐century problems that much has been written about it for laypeople. This article presents a content analysis of 14 popular books on systems thinking, revealing that ISSS members’ understanding nods and smiles belie a plurality of meanings assigned to systems thinking and claims about what it means to be a systems thinker. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2155

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:470-483

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1092-7026

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Systems Research and Behavioral Science from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().