Modernization and the noble/common distinction: Reading modern literature through Luhmannian and Foucauldian lenses

Carlton L. Clark

Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2021, vol. 38, issue 1, 158-172

Abstract: This article draws on Luhmannian and Foucauldian social theories to analyse the decline of the “nobility/commoner” distinction. Evidence from 17th‐ and 18th‐century tracts, treatises, letters, novels, and other sources suggests that the distinction between the nobility and the commoner lost currency as functional differentiation overruled social stratification in the second half of the eighteenth century. But to preserve a sense of difference, defenders of the nobility/commoner distinction adopted a “true nobility/pretended nobility” distinction, according to which the hereditary nobility possessed noble qualities by nature, whereas the rising commoners could acquire only false nobility. Functional differentiation was met with a countermovement that attempted to establish a tighter, grid‐like social order in place of the looser medieval social order. Finally, the complexity–sustainability trade‐off principle helps to explain why the hereditary nobility might have ignored the seemingly clear evidence of an impending threat to their privileged status.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2637

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:158-172

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1092-7026

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Systems Research and Behavioral Science from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().