IPRs and International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Six Large Emerging Countries
Fabio Montobbio,
Annalisa Primi and
Valerio Sterzi
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2015, vol. 106, issue 2, 187-204
Abstract:
This paper studies international knowledge flows looking at: (i) patent citations that track codified knowledge and (ii) technological collaborations between inventors that gauge knowledge transmitted through face to face contacts. It uses a gravity model for 13 countries (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China, South Africa, Mexico, the USA, the UK, Japan, Italy, Germany, France and Canada) using EPO data. In the case of tacit knowledge flows it shows that intellectual property rights (IPRs) reinforcement has no effect and that sharing a common legal origin and technological proximity are more important than geographical distance. In the case of codified knowledge flows IPRs reinforcement has a positive effect only when applicants’ citations are considered.
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/tesg.12131 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: IPRs and international knowledge flows: Evidence from six large emerging countries (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:106:y:2015:i:2:p:187-204
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0040-747X
Access Statistics for this article
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie is currently edited by Jan van Weesep
More articles in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie from Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().