Multifunctional perennial production systems for bioenergy: performance and progress
Oskar Englund,
Ioannis Dimitriou,
Virginia H. Dale,
Keith L. Kline,
Blas Mola‐Yudego,
Fionnuala Murphy,
Burton English,
John McGrath,
Gerald Busch,
Maria Cristina Negri,
Mark Brown,
Kevin Goss,
Sam Jackson,
Esther S. Parish,
Jules Cacho,
Colleen Zumpf,
John Quinn and
Shruti K. Mishra
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2020, vol. 9, issue 5
Abstract:
As the global population increases and becomes more affluent, biomass demands for food and biomaterials will increase. Demand growth is further accelerated by the implementation of climate policies and strategies to replace fossil resources with biomass. There are, however, concerns about the size of the prospective biomass demand and the environmental and social consequences of the corresponding resource mobilization, especially concerning impacts from the associated land‐use change. Strategically integrating perennials into landscapes dominated by intensive agriculture can, for example, improve biodiversity, reduce soil erosion and nutrient emissions to water, increase soil carbon, enhance pollination, and avoid or mitigate flooding events. Such “multifunctional perennial production systems” can thus contribute to improving overall land‐use sustainability, while maintaining or increasing overall biomass productivity in the landscape. Seven different cases in different world regions are here reviewed to exemplify and evaluate (a) multifunctional production systems that have been established to meet emerging bioenergy demands, and (b) efforts to identify locations where the establishment of perennial crops will be particularly beneficial. An important barrier towards wider implementation of multifunctional systems is the lack of markets, or policies, compensating producers for enhanced ecosystem services and other environmental benefits. This deficiency is particularly important since prices for fossil‐based fuels are low relative to bioenergy production costs. Without such compensation, multifunctional perennial production systems will be unlikely to contribute to the development of a sustainable bioeconomy. This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Systems and Infrastructure Bioenergy > Climate and Environment Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.375
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:wireae:v:9:y:2020:i:5:n:e375
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=2041-8396
Access Statistics for this article
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment is currently edited by Peter Lund and John Byrne
More articles in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().