Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
Giovanni Angelini (),
Cristina Bernini () and
Andrea Guizzardi ()
Additional contact information
Cristina Bernini: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna - Italy
Andrea Guizzardi: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna - Italy
Statistica, 2013, vol. 73, issue 2, 143-163
There is a growing literature on the assessment of quality of life (QOL) and subjective well-being (SWB) through composite indicators (CI), obtained by aggregating subjective measures of people well-being. Besides the measurement of elementary indicators, the principal challenges in constructing SWB indicator are the aggregation and weighting system. To this respect, literature hasn’t actually reached a unique consensus. The paper investigates the effects that different weighting systems (equally, factorial and DEA weights) have on the rankings and score distributions of the SWB indicators. Data are provide by a sample survey on the quality of life conducted on the residents in the Romagna area during 2010. Results evidence that diverse weighting techniques produce different SWB score distributions while, to a some extent, rankings are maintained.
Keywords: Community SWB; Bottom-up spillover theory; weighting system; ranking; Romagna area (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:73:y:2013:i:2:p:143-163
Access Statistics for this article
Statistica is currently edited by Department of Statistics, University of Bologna
More articles in Statistica from Department of Statistics, University of Bologna Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanna Galatà ().