EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring and testing the interview mode effect in mixed mode surveys

Furio Camillo () and Ida D’Attoma ()
Additional contact information
Furio Camillo: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna - Italy
Ida D’Attoma: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologan - Italy

Statistica, 2013, vol. 73, issue 4, 407-421

Abstract: Many studies are showing an increased tendency to use more than one data collection mode for a particular survey. However, mixed data collection modes may influence responses given by interviewees and require researchers to verify if differences in responses, when present, are ascribable to the type of data collection mode. Often, random assignment is not feasible and requires researchers to solve an additional and not negligible problem, namely to verify if differences in responses are ascribable to the self selection or to the type of data collection mode being used. The aim of the present paper is to measure the mode effect on the answers using a new data driven multivariate approach, that allows to disentangle the interview mode effect on answers from the effect of self selection. We will work through the use of the new multivariate method with AlmaLaurea case concerning the evaluation of two different data collection methods, the CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interviewing) and the CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing). As with any new statistical method, the success of this method depends on its efficacy in relation to that of the existing methods. Therefore, results of the multivariate approach will be compared to the Propensity Score method that AlmaLaurea usually applies to identify the presence of an interview mode effect. Both methods produce similar results.

Keywords: self-selection; global imbalance; mixed interview mode; mode effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:73:y:2013:i:4:p:407-421

Access Statistics for this article

Statistica is currently edited by Department of Statistics, University of Bologna

More articles in Statistica from Department of Statistics, University of Bologna Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanna Galatà ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:73:y:2013:i:4:p:407-421