Is Federalization a Corruption-Abatement Strategy in Developing Countries?
Raul Fabella,
Daway-Ducanes Sarah Lynne (),
Jandoc Karl Robert () and
Arzadon Irene Jo ()
Additional contact information
Daway-Ducanes Sarah Lynne: University of the Philippines Diliman School of Economics, 1101, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Jandoc Karl Robert: University of the Philippines Diliman School of Economics, 1101, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Arzadon Irene Jo: University of the Philippines Diliman School of Economics, 1101, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 2022, vol. 13, issue 3, 323-350
Abstract:
Would a shift to a Federal system raise or lower corruption in low-income countries? Local ownership, which is a strong argument for control of corruption under a Federal system, may not always be effective in jurisdictions with weak institutions. Our theoretical model shows that the net effect of these conflicting pressures cannot be determined a priori. Thus, we test empirically whether de jure federalism and/or de facto federalism are each a good predictor of control of corruption. We find that in countries with sufficiently high quality of governance or levels of development, neither de jure federalism nor de facto federalism matters as much as other dimensions of governance. However, in countries with poor governance, de jure federalism may have an adverse effect on control of corruption. A developing economy, which ranks poorly in terms of governance, cannot expect a reduction in corruption to follow a shift to a Federal system.
Keywords: federalism; de jure decentralization; fiscal decentralization; control of corruption; low-income countries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H10 H40 H70 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2022-0026 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:323-350:n:4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ajle/html
DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2022-0026
Access Statistics for this article
Asian Journal of Law and Economics is currently edited by Noriyuki Yanagawa
More articles in Asian Journal of Law and Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().