Discretionary vs. Mandatory Prosecution: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Comparative Criminal Procedure
Keisuke Nakao and
Tsumagari Masatoshi
Additional contact information
Tsumagari Masatoshi: Keio University
Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 2012, vol. 3, issue 1, 14
Abstract:
Using a game-theoretic model of criminal procedure, we investigate relative merits and demerits of discretionary and mandatory prosecution. The game illustrates a prosecutor's dilemma associated with his two tasks: evidence production and case screening. Discretionary prosecution makes use of incriminating evidence to dispose of weak cases, but discretionary prosecution may suffer the moral-hazard problem in evidence production more seriously than mandatory prosecution. Our welfare analyses suggest that mandatory prosecution outperforms discretionary prosecution when evidence transmission from the prosecutor to the judge is accurate and/or when the cost of litigation incurred by the prosecutor is large.
Keywords: discretionary prosecution; mandatory prosecution; case screening; evidence production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-4611.1071 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:3:y:2012:i:1:n:6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ajle/html
DOI: 10.1515/2154-4611.1071
Access Statistics for this article
Asian Journal of Law and Economics is currently edited by Noriyuki Yanagawa
More articles in Asian Journal of Law and Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().