Planned Solvency III Regulation: Should It Be Adopted Outside the European Union?

Zweifel Peter ()
Additional contact information
Zweifel Peter: Emeritus, Economics Dept., University of Zurich, Kreuth 371, A-9531Bad Bleiberg, Austria

Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2019, vol. 13, issue 1, 12

Abstract: Several countries outside the European Union consider adopting its solvency regulation for their insurance industries. However, Solvency I and (to a lesser extent) Solvency II were found to run the risk of inducing more rather than less risk-taking by insurers (Zweifel, Peter. 2014. “Solvency Regulation of Insurers: A Regulatory Failure?” Journal of Insurance Issues 37 (2): 135–157.). Companies are led to neglect parameters that link them to developments in the capital market when determining their endogenous perceived efficiency frontier (EPEF), causing it to become steeper. Given homothetic risk preferences, senior management is predicted to opt for increased rather than reduced volatility. By way of contrast, if modeled after Basel III for banks, planned Solvency III will ask insurers to take developments in the capital market into account in their formulation of business strategies designed to ensure solvency (Principle 5 of Basel III). In addition, the stipulated decrease in their leverage ratio is shown to reduce the slope of the EPEF for insurers with little solvency capital. Contrary to its predecessors, Solvency III is therefore predicted to make insurers take on less risk, which argues for its for adoption beyond the European Union if properly implemented.

Keywords: regulation; insurers; solvency; Solvency I; Solvency II; Solvency III; Basel III (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G15 G21 G28 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2018-0002 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:apjrin:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:12:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/apjri/html

DOI: 10.1515/apjri-2018-0002

Access Statistics for this article

Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance is currently edited by Michael R. Powers

More articles in Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().