EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Asset freezing, corporate political resources and the Tullock paradox

Bonardi Jean-Philippe () and Santiago Urbiztondo
Additional contact information
Bonardi Jean-Philippe: Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Business and Politics, 2013, vol. 15, issue 3, 275-293

Abstract: In 1967, Gordon Tullock asked why firms do not spend more on campaign contributions, despite the large rents that could be generated from political activities. We suggest in this paper that part of the puzzle could come from the fact that one important type of political activity has been neglected by the literature which focuses on campaign contributions or political connections. We call this neglected activity “asset freezing”: situations in which firms delay lay-offs or invest in specific technologies to support local politicians’ re-election objectives. In doing so, firms bear a potentially significant cost as they do not use a portion of their economic assets in the most efficient or productive way. The purpose of this paper is to provide a first theoretical exploration of this phenomenon. Building on the literature on corporate political resources, we argue that a firm’s economic assets can be evaluated based on their degree of “political freezability,” which depends on the flexibility of their use and on their value for policy-makers. We then develop a simple model in which financial contributions and freezing assets are alternative options for a firm willing to lawfully influence public policy-making, and derive some of our initial hypotheses more formally.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0034 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
Journal Article: Asset freezing, corporate political resources and the Tullock paradox (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:buspol:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:275-293:n:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.cambridg ... usiness-and-politics

DOI: 10.1515/bap-2012-0034

Access Statistics for this article

Business and Politics is currently edited by Vinod K. Aggarwal

More articles in Business and Politics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:bpj:buspol:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:275-293:n:3