What is modern about sovereign wealth funds? A reply to Pete Moore

Clark Gordon L. (), Dixon Adam D. and Monk Ashby H.B.
Additional contact information
Clark Gordon L.: Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford
Dixon Adam D.: School of Geographical Science, University of Bristol
Monk Ashby H.B.: Global Projects Center, Stanford University

Business and Politics, 2013, vol. 15, issue 4, 561-565

Abstract: We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore’s comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2013-0026 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:buspol:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:561-565:n:6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.cambridg ... usiness-and-politics

DOI: 10.1515/bap-2013-0026

Access Statistics for this article

Business and Politics is currently edited by Vinod K. Aggarwal

More articles in Business and Politics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().