Who defines “local”? Resistance to harmonizing standards in ethical markets
McCaffrey Sara Jane () and
Kurland Nancy
Additional contact information
McCaffrey Sara Jane: Patricia E. Harris Center for Business, Government, and Public Policy, Franklin & Marshall College, Room 114, PO Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, USA
Kurland Nancy: Patricia E. Harris Center for Business, Government, and Public Policy, Franklin & Marshall College, Room 112, PO Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, USA
Business and Politics, 2014, vol. 16, issue 1, 191-219
Abstract:
Standards for “ethical” goods provide activists and mission-driven producers with opportunities to clarify decisions for so-called “ethical consumers” and spur growth in these new markets. But certification schemes also raise monitoring challenges, and may confuse consumers and create opportunities for cooptation by large corporate competitors. In this interview-based study, we examined the localism movement to understand why social movement leaders might resist harmonization of standards. We find that leaders define “local” in at least five ways, and argue that they resist harmonization of local for pragmatic, philosophical, and strategic reasons. We conclude that tolerance for multiple standards could be beneficial for core activists in market-oriented social movements. If and when these groups turn more systematically to the political system, maintaining loose and multiple standards may impede policy success. The “buy local” case suggests, however, that as long as the market remains activists’ primary mechanism for social change, decentralized governance and multiple standards in ethical markets allow activists to maintain a powerful voice in defining ethical products and business practices.
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0026 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:buspol:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:191-219:n:4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.cambridg ... usiness-and-politics
DOI: 10.1515/bap-2012-0026
Access Statistics for this article
Business and Politics is currently edited by Vinod K. Aggarwal
More articles in Business and Politics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().