Excessive Ambitions
Elster Jon
Additional contact information
Elster Jon: Collège de France and Columbia University
Capitalism and Society, 2009, vol. 4, issue 2, 33
Abstract:
The current financial crisis has brought out a fatal flaw in the foundations of the economic theories that guided economic agents and regulators: the unwarranted claim to precision and robustness. In this article I try to diagnose this flaw and discuss possible remedies. I argue that actual agents are intrinsically less sophisticated than the models assume they are, and that the various proposals to sustain the models by appealing to "as-if rationality" all fail. I next consider behavioral economics as an alternative to the standard models, claiming that while they may allow for successful retrodiction, they do not hold out much promise for prediction. I also discuss the use of statistical models, arguing that they are subject to so many traps and pitfalls that only a handful of elite practitioners can be trusted to use them well. Finally, I offer some speculations to explain the persistence in the economic profession and elsewhere of these useless or harmful models.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1055 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:capsoc:v:4:y:2009:i:2:n:1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/cas/html
DOI: 10.2202/1932-0213.1055
Access Statistics for this article
Capitalism and Society is currently edited by Edmund Phelps and Amar Bhidé
More articles in Capitalism and Society from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().