Clarifying causal mediation analysis: Effect identification via three assumptions and five potential outcomes

Nguyen Trang Quynh (), Schmid Ian, Ogburn Elizabeth L. and Stuart Elizabeth A.
Additional contact information
Nguyen Trang Quynh: Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Schmid Ian: Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Ogburn Elizabeth L.: Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Stuart Elizabeth A.: Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Journal of Causal Inference, 2022, vol. 10, issue 1, 246-279

Abstract: Causal mediation analysis is complicated with multiple effect definitions that require different sets of assumptions for identification. This article provides a systematic explanation of such assumptions. We define five potential outcome types whose means are involved in various effect definitions. We tackle their mean/distribution’s identification, starting with the one that requires the weakest assumptions and gradually building up to the one that requires the strongest assumptions. This presentation shows clearly why an assumption is required for one estimand and not another, and provides a succinct table from which an applied researcher could pick out the assumptions required for identifying the causal effects they target. Using a running example, the article illustrates the assembling and consideration of identifying assumptions for a range of causal contrasts. For several that are commonly encountered in the literature, this exercise clarifies that identification requires weaker assumptions than those often stated in the literature. This attention to the details also draws attention to the differences in the positivity assumption for different estimands, with practical implications. Clarity on the identifying assumptions of these various estimands will help researchers conduct appropriate mediation analyses and interpret the results with appropriate caution given the plausibility of the assumptions.

Keywords: identification; assumptions; mediation; causal inference; causal mediation analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0049 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:246-279:n:1

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0049

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().