Bias attenuation results for dichotomization of a continuous confounder

Gabriel Erin E. (), Peña Jose M. () and Sjölander Arvid ()
Additional contact information
Gabriel Erin E.: Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Peña Jose M.: Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Sjölander Arvid: Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden

Journal of Causal Inference, 2022, vol. 10, issue 1, 515-526

Abstract: It is well-known that dichotomization can cause bias and loss of efficiency in estimation. One can easily construct examples where adjusting for a dichotomized confounder causes bias in causal estimation. There are additional examples in the literature where adjusting for a dichotomized confounder can be more biased than not adjusting at all. The message is clear, do not dichotomize. What is unclear is if there are scenarios where adjusting for the dichotomized confounder always leads to lower bias than not adjusting. We propose several sets of conditions that characterize scenarios where one should always adjust for the dichotomized confounder to reduce bias. We then highlight scenarios where the decision to adjust should be made more cautiously. To our knowledge, this is the first formal presentation of conditions that give information about when one should and potentially should not adjust for a dichotomized confounder.

Keywords: bias; causal inference; dichotomized confounder (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2022-0047 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:515-526:n:1

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2022-0047

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().