EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Matching estimators of causal effects in clustered observational studies

Cui Can (), Zhang Yunshu (), Yang Shu (), Reich Brian J. () and Gill David A. ()
Additional contact information
Cui Can: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
Zhang Yunshu: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
Yang Shu: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
Reich Brian J.: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
Gill David A.: Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America

Journal of Causal Inference, 2025, vol. 13, issue 1, 16

Abstract: Marine conservation preserves fish biodiversity, protects marine and coastal ecosystems, and supports climate resilience and adaptation. Despite the importance of establishing marine protected areas (MPAs), research on the effectiveness of MPAs with different conservation policies is limited due to the lack of quantitative MPA information. In this article, by leveraging a global MPA database, we investigate the causal impact of MPA policies on fish biodiversity. To address challenges posed by this clustered and confounded observational study, we construct a bias-corrected matching estimator of the average treatment effect assuming treatment is assigned at the cluster level and a cluster-weighted bootstrap method for variance estimation. We establish the theoretical guarantees of the matching estimator and its variance estimator. Under our proposed matching framework, we recommend matching on both cluster-level and unit-level covariates to achieve efficiency. The simulation study results demonstrate that our matching strategy minimizes the bias and achieves the nominal confidence interval coverage. Applying our proposed matching method to compare different MPA policies reveals that the no-take policy is more effective than the multi-use policy in preserving fish biodiversity.

Keywords: causal inference; conservation; potential outcomes; weighted bootstrap (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2024-0061 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:16:n:1001

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2024-0061

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-08
Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:16:n:1001