EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

M-bias, Butterfly Bias, and Butterfly Bias with Correlated Causes – A Comment on Ding and Miratrix (2015)

Thoemmes Felix ()
Additional contact information
Thoemmes Felix: Human Development, Cornell University, MVR G62A, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Journal of Causal Inference, 2015, vol. 3, issue 2, 253-258

Abstract: Ding and Miratrix [1] recently concluded that adjustment on a pre-treatment covariate is almost always preferable to reduce bias. I extend the examined parameter space of the models considered by Ding and Miratrix, and consider slight extensions of their models as well. Similar to the conclusion by Pearl [7], I identify constellations in which bias due to adjustment, or failing to adjust is symmetrical, but also confirm some findings of Ding and Miratrix.

Keywords: M-bias; causal inference; butterfly bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2015-0012 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:253-258:n:9

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2015-0012

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:253-258:n:9