Generalized Structural Mean Models for Evaluating Depression as a Post-treatment Effect Modifier of a Jobs Training Intervention

Stephens Alisa (), Keele Luke () and Joffe Marshall ()
Additional contact information
Stephens Alisa: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine 624 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Keele Luke: 304 Old North, 37th & O St, NW, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
Joffe Marshall: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine 624 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Journal of Causal Inference, 2016, vol. 4, issue 2, 17

Abstract: In randomized controlled trials, the evaluation of an overall treatment effect is often followed by effect modification or subgroup analyses, where the possibility of a different magnitude or direction of effect for varying values of a covariate is explored. While studies of effect modification are typically restricted to pretreatment covariates, longitudinal experimental designs permit the examination of treatment effect modification by intermediate outcomes, where intermediates are measured after treatment but before the final outcome. We present a novel application of generalized structural mean models (GSMMs) for simultaneously assessing effect modification by post-treatment covariates and accounting for noncompliance to assigned treatment status. The proposed approach may also be used to identify post-treatment effect modifiers in the absence of noncompliance. The methods are evaluated using a simulation study that demonstrates that our approach retains consistent estimation of effect modification by intermediate variables that are affected by treatment and also predict outcomes. We illustrate the method using a randomized trial designed to promote re-employment through teaching skills to enhance self-esteem and inoculate job seekers against setbacks in the job search process. Our analysis provides some evidence that the intervention was much less successful among subjects that displayed higher levels of depression at intermediate post-treatment waves of the study. We also compare the assumptions of our approach and principal stratification as alternatives to account for differences in effects by intermediate variables.

Keywords: post-treatment interaction; structural mean model; causal odds-ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2015-0032 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:17:n:4

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2015-0032

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().