EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Redefining the Freedom of Establishment under EU Law as the Freedom to Choose the Applicable Company Law: A Discussion after the Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 25 October 2017 in Case C-106/16, Polbud

Mucha Ariel () and Oplustil Krzysztof ()
Additional contact information
Mucha Ariel: PhD candidate, Jagiellonian University, Senior Research Assistant, Allerhand Institute in Kraków.Allerhand InstituteKrakówPoland
Oplustil Krzysztof: Dr hab., Professor of Jagiellonian University.We wish to thank Christoph Teichmann for helpful comments to a preliminary draft. Usual disclaimers apply. The present article was prepared with the financial assistance of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

European Company and Financial Law Review, 2018, vol. 15, issue 2, 270-307

Abstract: On 25 October 2017, the Court of Justice handed down a judgment in the Polbud case (C-106/16). This is the result of three preliminary questions raised by the Polish SC. The facts in the case concern the Polish private limited liability company which wanted to transfer its registered office to Luxembourg and to change its legal form. In general, the questions refer to two pertinent issues: first, if the national law providing for mandatory company’s liquidation in case of transferring the company’s seat abroad complies with the EU law, and second, if the so-called isolated cross-border conversion is covered by the freedom of establishment. With little doubt, the first question was answered in the negative. As to the second issue, the Court holds that it is not mandatory in the light of EU law for the company wishing to transfer its registered office and convert itself into a company governed by the law of another MS to establish an economic presence in that MS. It is likely that the Court of Justice’s findings will open another Pandora’s box with many unknown results, mainly concerning minority shareholders’ and creditors’ protection as well as further (un)desired liberalisation of the internal market.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0010 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:270-307:n:4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ecfr/html

DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0010

Access Statistics for this article

European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte

More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:270-307:n:4