Corporate Governance Codes and Groups of Companies: In Search of Best Practices for Group Governance

Szabó Dániel Gergely and Sørensen Karsten Engsig
Additional contact information
Szabó Dániel Gergely: Department of Law, Aarhus University.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
Sørensen Karsten Engsig: Department of Law, Aarhus University.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

European Company and Financial Law Review, 2018, vol. 15, issue 4, 697-731

Abstract: Many listed companies are part of a group of companies and therefore they are facing the special challenges of effecting group governance. Group governance will involve balancing the interests of the group against the interests of the individual companies in the group. Finding the right balance between these two is not always easy, which is confirmed by that the Commission has announced its intention to facilitate the recognition of the concept of ‘group interest’ in EU company law.We have analysed a number of corporate governance codes to see how they address the issue of group governance. We initially examined 48 codes, but selected 16 codes for detailed analysis. In the codes analysed we have found some recommendations for how groups of companies should be governed, but they are often found in different codes, often apply to a broader category of situations, not specifically group situations, and in some cases point in different directions. Therefore, it seems fair to say that the current recommendations for group governance are fragmented and superficial. Since we have analysed those codes that, based on our initial survey of 48 codes, were most likely to contain recommendations on these issues, the recommendations on group governance in other codes are even more likely to be fragmented or non-existent.Therefore, there seems to be a need for more clarity on group governance and the Commission’s intention to address the issue of group interest should be welcomed. However, since there is little consensus on what constitutes good group governance, considering the often opposing strategies underlying the analysed codes’ recommendations, the Commission also has a difficult task if it decides to take steps to operationalise the recognition of group interests.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0022 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:697-731:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ecfr/html

DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0022

Access Statistics for this article

European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte

More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().