Moving Past Reliance – The Problem of a Reliance Requirement in Secondary Market Securities Litigation and Solutions from Select Jurisdictions

Yli-Kankahila Heidi M. K. ()
Additional contact information
Yli-Kankahila Heidi M. K.: Doctoral Researcher, Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

European Company and Financial Law Review, 2023, vol. 20, issue 3, 447-480

Abstract: 447Investors’ individual reliance on misstated inside information as an element of causation in securities litigation has provoked criticism. Scholarship has long acknowledged that a reliance requirement is not justified as damage may occur without an investor’s reliance on misstated inside information in the secondary market. This article analyses the reliance requirement in select European jurisdictions (the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom) and the United States. The article investigates whether a reliance requirement exists in the secondary market litigation regime in said jurisdictions and analyses whether a presumption of reliance exists to fulfil the reliance requirement. The article argues that most of the suggested solutions to resolve the reliance problem are not entirely satisfactory. An often-suggested presumption of reliance, while leavening the investors’ burden of proof, keeps the reliance requirement in place. This article submits that proof of individual investors’ reliance should not be required in secondary market inside information misstatement cases. Discarding the reliance requirement altogether makes any presumptions redundant as well.448

Keywords: individual reliance; reliance requirement; causation; misstatement; damage; secondary market; presumption of reliance; investor; inside information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2023-0023 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:447-480:n:7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ecfr/html

DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2023-0023

Access Statistics for this article

European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte

More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().