Shareholder Activism and ESG: From Locust to Green Knight? A Perspective from the Netherlands

Duynstee D. J. F. F. M. (), Drenth T. () and Pijls A. C. W. ()
Additional contact information
Duynstee D. J. F. F. M.: Dirk-Jan Duynstee and Tiemen Drenth are lawyers at Clifford Chance LLP. Arnoud Pijls is professor of European and Comparative Financial Law at Radboud University Nijmegen. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Fabienne Evers, research assistant of the Financial Law Centre (FLC) of Radboud University Nijmegen, for her research assistance. Research for this article was completed on 1 October 2024. Subsequent developments have not been included.Radboud University NijmegenAmsterdamNetherlands
Drenth T.: Radboud University Nijmegen Amsterdam Netherlands
Pijls A. C. W.: Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen Netherlands

European Company and Financial Law Review, 2025, vol. 22, issue 1, 42-69

Abstract: In this article, we will answer the questions (i) what is the role and what are the rights of activist shareholders under Dutch law, (ii) how these rights relate to ESG developments, and (iii) whether the associated changes in shareholder activism will affect the existing negative image of activist shareholders and their limited rights. We will examine all of this against the backdrop of recent developments – both legislative and practical – around ESG and the broad public support for it. In other words: will the pendulum, that in recent years has placed the power in the company in the hands of the management board and the supervisory board, swing back a bit toward the shareholders? We will discuss these matters from the Dutch perspective and will focus on the rights of shareholders according to Dutch law. The structure is as follows. In Section 2, we first outline the current playing field. What and who are activist shareholders, what do they want, what strategies do they employ and what trends can be discerned in practice? In Section 3, we provide a brief overview of the legal and non-legal “tools” that activist shareholders use. In Section 4, we discuss some recent developments in the field of ESG legislation and examine whether those developments affect or should affect existing shareholder rights. In Section 5, we discuss some additional “routes of attack” that the ESG-oriented activist shareholder can take. In Section 6, we wrap up with a brief conclusion.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2025-0002 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:42-69:n:1003

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... ournal/key/ecfr/html

DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2025-0002

Access Statistics for this article

European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte

More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().