The ECJ on the Verge of a Member State Friendly Judicature? – Annotation to the Marks & Spencer Judgement, ECJ 13. 12. 2005, C-446/03
Seer Roman
Additional contact information
Seer Roman: Prof. Dr. iur., Holder of the chair of tax law, Ruhr-University Bochum.
European Company and Financial Law Review, 2006, vol. 3, issue 2, 237-247
Abstract:
On 13 December 2005, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has issued apart from the SEVIC case the second decision in the field of cross-border company activities. In contrast to many literary anticipations, the Court did not reject the UK domestic focused group taxation system as a general violation of Art. 43 and 48 EC Treaty. The ECJ rather tries to balance the fundamental freedoms and the legal and budgetary interests of the Member States by emphasizing the principle of territoriality. Only if the foreign subsidiary (or a third party as a purchaser) has no opportunity to effectively use its incurred losses in the state of its domicile, the state of residence of the parent company is obliged by Community law to reduce he losses from the taxable income (ultima ratio-principle). The reasons given for the judgement leave much uncertainty and reveal a lack of dogmatic foundation.
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2006.010 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:3:y:2006:i:2:p:237-247:n:6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ecfr/html
DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2006.010
Access Statistics for this article
European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte
More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().