Non-tariff Measures and Regulatory Alignment in a North-South Context: Assessing Compliance Costs for Tunisian Agriculture under the EU-Tunisia Free Trade Agreement (ALECA)

Tröster Bernhard (), Rudiger von Arnim, Raza Werner, Chandoul Jihen and Ben Rouine Chafik
Additional contact information
Tröster Bernhard: Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), Wien, Austria
Rudiger von Arnim: Department of Economics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
Raza Werner: Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), Wien, Austria
Chandoul Jihen: Observatoire Tunisien de l’Economie (OTE), Tunis, Tunisia
Ben Rouine Chafik: Observatoire Tunisien de l’Economie (OTE), Tunis, Tunisia

Journal of Globalization and Development, 2023, vol. 14, issue 1, 51-85

Abstract: Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs) are usually defined as trade costs. Their reduction through regulatory alignment increases trade and could thus be beneficial for countries concerned. NTMs include any regulations at and behind the border (i.e. domestic regulations) that may have an impact on trade. This view of NTMs does not account for potential benefits on public policy goals, welfare, value addition and trade flows. Further, asymmetrical NTM alignment between countries with strongly divergent regulatory standards will cause adjustment and compliance costs. Here we integrate the effects of compliance costs for producers emerging from regulatory alignment into the ‘ÖFSE Global Trade’ model. We use the ongoing negotiations on the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Tunisia (ALECA) to empirically assess the compliance costs for Tunisian agricultural producers to align to EU standards and model potential economic impacts. Scenario designs for our simulation analysis build on firm surveys. Results show that North-South trade agreements with asymmetrical regulatory alignment involve substantial adjustment costs for Southern producers and lead to losses in exports, value-added and employment, resulting in high economic and social costs that need to be weighed by policy-makers against any perceived long run gains from regulatory alignment.

Keywords: non-tariff measures; EU-Tunisia ALECA; CGE model; regulatory approximation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2021-0044 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:globdv:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:51-85:n:4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jgd/html

DOI: 10.1515/jgd-2021-0044

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Globalization and Development is currently edited by Joseph E. Stiglitz, Kevin Gallagher, Jeronim Capaldo, Arjun Jayadev, José Antonio Ocampo and Dani Rodrik

More articles in Journal of Globalization and Development from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().