Reforming the IMF Surcharge Rate Policy to Avoid Procyclical Lending

Gallagher Kevin, Guzman Martin (), Joseph Stiglitz and Uy Marilou
Additional contact information
Gallagher Kevin: Professor, 5798 Boston University Pardee School of Global Studies and Director, Boston University , Global Development Policy Center, Boston, MA, USA
Guzman Martin: Professor, Columbia University SIPA and Co-President, Initiative for Policy Dialogue, New York, NY, USA
Uy Marilou: Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Boston University, Global Development Policy Center, Boston, MA, USA

Journal of Globalization and Development, 2024, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) levies ‘surcharges’ or extra fees beyond the normal borrowing costs on member countries that either draw “sufficiently large” amounts of IMF credit to mitigate balance of payments constraints, or that maintain their credit exposure with the institution for “sufficiently long” periods of time. Such surcharges have become increasingly important: 10 countries paid surcharges in 2020. Now, 22 countries are subject to IMF surcharges, and revenues from surcharges between 2020 and 2023 have reached about $6.4 billion, just as countries are struggling to recover from their balance of payments issues amidst multiple shocks, such as COVID-19, climate change, war, and advanced economy interest rate changes. Reportedly designed to discourage the overuse of Fund resources and to ensure the financial soundness of the IMF’s own balance sheet, in recent years surcharges have come under scrutiny for two reasons. First, such surcharges are inherently pro-cyclical as they increase the burden of debt payments at exactly the time when a member country needs counter-cyclical and low-cost financing, contravening the very rationale of the IMF. Secondly, IMF surcharges have now become among the largest sources of revenue for the IMF, creating a perverse situation whereby the most economically disadvantaged member countries are a major source of income for Fund operations. This paper reviews the rationale for IMF surcharges, evaluates their impacts on member country economies and on the IMF business model, and presents and evaluates various proposals for IMF surcharge reform.

Keywords: surcharges; international monetary fund; balance of payments crises (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F32 F33 F34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2024-0051 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:globdv:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-14:n:1004

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jgd/html

DOI: 10.1515/jgd-2024-0051

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Globalization and Development is currently edited by Joseph E. Stiglitz, Kevin Gallagher, Jeronim Capaldo, Arjun Jayadev, José Antonio Ocampo and Dani Rodrik

More articles in Journal of Globalization and Development from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().