Adaptation of Chain Event Graphs for use with Case-Control Studies in Epidemiology

Keeble Claire (), Thwaites Peter Adam (), Barber Stuart (), Law Graham Richard () and Baxter Paul David ()
Additional contact information
Keeble Claire: School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Thwaites Peter Adam: School of Mathematics, Department of Statistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Barber Stuart: School of Mathematics, Department of Statistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Law Graham Richard: Sleep Science and Medical Statistics, Lincoln, UK
Baxter Paul David: School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2017, vol. 13, issue 2, 25

Abstract: Case-control studies are used in epidemiology to try to uncover the causes of diseases, but are a retrospective study design known to suffer from non-participation and recall bias, which may explain their decreased popularity in recent years. Traditional analyses report usually only the odds ratio for given exposures and the binary disease status. Chain event graphs are a graphical representation of a statistical model derived from event trees which have been developed in artificial intelligence and statistics, and only recently introduced to the epidemiology literature. They are a modern Bayesian technique which enable prior knowledge to be incorporated into the data analysis using the agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm, used to form a suitable chain event graph. Additionally, they can account for missing data and be used to explore missingness mechanisms. Here we adapt the chain event graph framework to suit scenarios often encountered in case-control studies, to strengthen this study design which is time and financially efficient. We demonstrate eight adaptations to the graphs, which consist of two suitable for full case-control study analysis, four which can be used in interim analyses to explore biases, and two which aim to improve the ease and accuracy of analyses. The adaptations are illustrated with complete, reproducible, fully-interpreted examples, including the event tree and chain event graph. Chain event graphs are used here for the first time to summarise non-participation, data collection techniques, data reliability, and disease severity in case-control studies. We demonstrate how these features of a case-control study can be incorporated into the analysis to provide further insight, which can help to identify potential biases and lead to more accurate study results.

Keywords: chain event graph; case-control study; non-participation; missing data; selection bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2016-0073 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:25:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ijb/html

DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2016-0073

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Biostatistics is currently edited by Antoine Chambaz, Alan E. Hubbard and Mark J. van der Laan

More articles in The International Journal of Biostatistics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().