Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study

Tran Linh (), Yiannoutsos Constantin, Wools-Kaloustian Kara, Siika Abraham, Mark van der Laan and Petersen Maya
Additional contact information
Tran Linh: Department of Biostatistics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Yiannoutsos Constantin: Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Wools-Kaloustian Kara: Infectious Diseases, Howard Hughes Medical Institute - Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Siika Abraham: Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
Mark van der Laan: University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAUSA
Petersen Maya: University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAUSA

The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2019, vol. 15, issue 2, 27

Abstract: A number of sophisticated estimators of longitudinal effects have been proposed for estimating the intervention-specific mean outcome. However, there is a relative paucity of research comparing these methods directly to one another. In this study, we compare various approaches to estimating a causal effect in a longitudinal treatment setting using both simulated data and data measured from a human immunodeficiency virus cohort. Six distinct estimators are considered: (i) an iterated conditional expectation representation, (ii) an inverse propensity weighted method, (iii) an augmented inverse propensity weighted method, (iv) a double robust iterated conditional expectation estimator, (v) a modified version of the double robust iterated conditional expectation estimator, and (vi) a targeted minimum loss-based estimator. The details of each estimator and its implementation are presented along with nuisance parameter estimation details, which include potentially pooling the observed data across all subjects regardless of treatment history and using data adaptive machine learning algorithms. Simulations are constructed over six time points, with each time point steadily increasing in positivity violations. Estimation is carried out for both the simulations and applied example using each of the six estimators under both stratified and pooled approaches of nuisance parameter estimation. Simulation results show that double robust estimators remained without meaningful bias as long as at least one of the two nuisance parameters were estimated with a correctly specified model. Under full misspecification, the bias of the double robust estimators remained better than that of the inverse propensity estimator under misspecification, but worse than the iterated conditional expectation estimator. Weighted estimators tended to show better performance than the covariate estimators. As positivity violations increased, the mean squared error and bias of all estimators considered became worse, with covariate-based double robust estimators especially susceptible. Applied analyses showed similar estimates at most time points, with the important exception of the inverse propensity estimator which deviated markedly as positivity violations increased. Given its efficiency, ability to respect the parameter space, and observed performance, we recommend the pooled and weighted targeted minimum loss-based estimator.

Keywords: aiptw; causal inference; double robust; efficient influence function; iptw; longitudinal treatment; multiple testing; semiparametric models; tmle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2017-0054 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:15:y:2019:i:2:p:27:n:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ijb/html

DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Biostatistics is currently edited by Antoine Chambaz, Alan E. Hubbard and Mark J. van der Laan

More articles in The International Journal of Biostatistics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().