Estimators for the value of the optimal dynamic treatment rule with application to criminal justice interventions

Montoya Lina M. (), J. van der Laan Mark, Skeem Jennifer L. and Petersen Maya L.
Additional contact information
Montoya Lina M.: Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599-7400, USA
J. van der Laan Mark: Division of Biostatistics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
Skeem Jennifer L.: School of Social Work and Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
Petersen Maya L.: Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA

The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2023, vol. 19, issue 1, 239-259

Abstract: Given an (optimal) dynamic treatment rule, it may be of interest to evaluate that rule – that is, to ask the causal question: what is the expected outcome had every subject received treatment according to that rule? In this paper, we study the performance of estimators that approximate the true value of: (1) an a priori known dynamic treatment rule (2) the true, unknown optimal dynamic treatment rule (ODTR); (3) an estimated ODTR, a so-called “data-adaptive parameter,” whose true value depends on the sample. Using simulations of point-treatment data, we specifically investigate: (1) the impact of increasingly data-adaptive estimation of nuisance parameters and/or of the ODTR on performance; (2) the potential for improved efficiency and bias reduction through the use of semiparametric efficient estimators; and, (3) the importance of sample splitting based on the cross-validated targeted maximum likelihood estimator (CV-TMLE) for accurate inference. In the simulations considered, there was very little cost and many benefits to using CV-TMLE to estimate the value of the true and estimated ODTR; importantly, and in contrast to non cross-validated estimators, the performance of CV-TMLE was maintained even when highly data-adaptive algorithms were used to estimate both nuisance parameters and the ODTR. In addition, we apply these estimators for the value of the rule to the “Interventions” study, an ongoing randomized controlled trial, to identify whether assigning cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to criminal justice-involved adults with mental illness using an ODTR significantly reduces the probability of recidivism, compared to assigning CBT in a non-individualized way.

Keywords: causal roadmap; heterogeneous treatment effects; optimal dynamic treatment rule; precision health; value of rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2020-0128 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:239-259:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ijb/html

DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0128

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Biostatistics is currently edited by Antoine Chambaz, Alan E. Hubbard and Mark J. van der Laan

More articles in The International Journal of Biostatistics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().