Prognostic adjustment with efficient estimators to unbiasedly leverage historical data in randomized trials

Liao Lauren D. (), Højbjerre-Frandsen Emilie, Hubbard Alan E. and Schuler Alejandro ()
Additional contact information
Liao Lauren D.: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
Højbjerre-Frandsen Emilie: Biostatistics Methods and Outreach, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
Hubbard Alan E.: Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Schuler Alejandro: Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2025, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a cornerstone of comparative effectiveness, they typically have much smaller sample size than observational studies due to financial and ethical considerations. Therefore there is interest in using plentiful historical data (either observational data or prior trials) to reduce trial sizes. Previous estimators developed for this purpose rely on unrealistic assumptions, without which the added data can bias the treatment effect estimate. Recent work proposed an alternative method (prognostic covariate adjustment) that imposes no additional assumptions and increases efficiency in trial analyses. The idea is to use historical data to learn a prognostic model: a regression of the outcome onto the covariates. The predictions from this model, generated from the RCT subjects’ baseline variables, are then used as a covariate in a linear regression analysis of the trial data. In this work, we extend prognostic adjustment to trial analyses with nonparametric efficient estimators, which are more powerful than linear regression. We provide theory that explains why prognostic adjustment improves small-sample point estimation and inference without any possibility of bias. Simulations corroborate the theory: efficient estimators using prognostic adjustment compared to without provides greater power (i.e., smaller standard errors) when the trial is small. Population shifts between historical and trial data attenuate benefits but do not introduce bias. We showcase our estimator using clinical trial data provided by Novo Nordisk A/S that evaluates insulin therapy for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: causal inference; diabetes; historical data; prognostic score; randomized trials (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2024-0018 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:1-15:n:1008

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... journal/key/ijb/html

DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2024-0018

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Biostatistics is currently edited by Antoine Chambaz, Alan E. Hubbard and Mark J. van der Laan

More articles in The International Journal of Biostatistics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().