Are Multiple Contrast Tests Superior to the ANOVA?
Konietschke Frank (),
Bösiger Sandra (),
Brunner Edgar () and
Hothorn Ludwig A. ()
Additional contact information
Konietschke Frank: Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, Göttingen, Lower Saxony 37073, Germany
Bösiger Sandra: Siemens – Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Brunner Edgar: Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
Hothorn Ludwig A.: Institute of Biostatistics, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany
The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2013, vol. 9, issue 1, 63-73
Abstract:
Multiple contrast tests can be used to test arbitrary linear hypotheses by providing local and global test decisions as well as simultaneous confidence intervals. The ANOVA-F-test on the contrary can be used to test the global null hypothesis of no treatment effect. Thus, multiple contrast tests provide more information than the analysis of variance (ANOVA) by offering which levels cause the significance. We compare the exact powers of the ANOVA-F-test and multiple contrast tests to reject the global null hypothesis. Hereby, we compute their least favorable configurations (LFCs). It turns out that both procedures have the same LFCs under certain conditions. Exact power investigations show that their powers are equal to detect their LFCs.
Keywords: analysis of variance; multiple contrast tests; multivariate t-distribution; one-way layout; least favorable configuration; sample size computations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2012-0020 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:11:n:2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ijb/html
DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0020
Access Statistics for this article
The International Journal of Biostatistics is currently edited by Antoine Chambaz, Alan E. Hubbard and Mark J. van der Laan
More articles in The International Journal of Biostatistics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().