Identifying the analytical implications of alternative regulatory philosophies

Fraas Art () and Morgenstern Richard
Additional contact information
Fraas Art: Resources for the Future, 1616 P St, NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20036-1400, USA
Morgenstern Richard: Resources for the Future, 1616 P St, NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20036-1400, USA

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, vol. 5, issue 1, 137-171

Abstract: The core analytical elements of Executive Order 12291 are widely seen as having been embraced by both Democratic and Republican administrations. Some critics argue, however, that this embrace is superficial and serves more as a cover for political decisions. To address this question, this paper examines the analytical priorities presented in the annual Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations over the period from 1997 to 2012. While there is general agreement across administrations on such broad issues as the importance of benefit-cost analysis in providing a shared framework and discipline to the analytic process, we identify important differences in five areas: monetization of benefits, scope of costs considered, behavioral economics, intergenerational benefits, and the general equilibrium impacts of regulation. All are active and exciting issues in the current scholarly work on regulation. These cross-administration differences appear to reflect a relatively modest shifting across political parties on issues where reasonable people might disagree, rather than major ideological swings in approach.

Keywords: Benefit-cost analysis; economic growth; cost-effectiveness analysis; discount rates; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2013-0029 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
Journal Article: Identifying the analytical implications of alternative regulatory philosophies (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:35:n:5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jbca/html

DOI: 10.1515/jbca-2013-0029

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis is currently edited by Glenn C. Blomquist and William H. Hoy

More articles in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().