Introduction to a special issue entitled Perspectives on Implementing Benefit-Cost Analysis in Climate Assessment

Sussman Fran (), Grambsch Anne, Li Jia and Weaver Christopher P.
Additional contact information
Sussman Fran: ICF International, 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, DC, 20006, USA
Grambsch Anne: Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Li Jia: Climate Change Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Weaver Christopher P.: Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, vol. 5, issue 3, 333-346

Abstract: Over the past half-century or more, economists have developed a robust literature on the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) as applied to diverse projects and policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for practical applications of BCA to climate change policy questions. As economists seek to meet this demand, they face challenges that arise from the nature of climate change impacts, such as the long time frame and the potential for non-marginal changes, the importance of intangible effects, and the need to grapple with Knightian uncertainty. As a result of these and other characteristics of climate change, many of the fundamental tenets of BCA are coming under scrutiny and the limits of BCA’s methodological and practical boundaries are being tested. This special issue assembles a set of papers that review the growing body of literature on the economics of climate change. The papers describe the state of the literature valuing climate change impacts, both globally and at more disaggregated levels. The papers also discuss the challenges economists face in applying BCA to support climate change decision making and adaptation planning. This introduction provides background and context on the current use of BCA in climate change analysis, and sets each paper firmly in that context, identifying also areas for future research. While the challenges in conducting BCA and interpreting its results are significant, across the papers it becomes clear that economic analysis in general, and the tools and methods of BCA in particular, have a central role to play in supporting decision-making about how to respond to climate change.

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis; climate change; decision-making; uncertainty; valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9000 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:333-346:n:1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jbca/html

DOI: 10.1515/jbca-2014-9000

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis is currently edited by Glenn C. Blomquist and William H. Hoy

More articles in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().