Challenges in applying the paradigm of welfare economics to climate change

Sussman Fran (), Weaver Christopher P. and Grambsch Anne
Additional contact information
Sussman Fran: ICF International, 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, DC, 20006, USA
Weaver Christopher P.: Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Grambsch Anne: Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, vol. 5, issue 3, 347-376

Abstract: This paper discusses the challenges inherent in developing benefit-cost analysis (BCAs) of climate change. Challenges are explored from three perspectives: meeting the foundational premises for conducting BCA within the framework of welfare economics, methodological considerations that affect the application of the tools and techniques of BCA, and practical limitations that arise out of resource constraints and the nature of the question, project, or policy being evaluated. Although economic analysts frequently face – and overcome – conceptual and practical complications in developing BCAs, climate change presents difficulties beyond those posed by more conventional environmental problems. Five characteristics of the climate system and associated impacts on human and natural systems are identified that pose particular challenges to BCA of climate change, including ubiquity of impacts, intangibility, non-marginal changes, long timeframes, and uncertainty. These characteristics interact with traditional economic challenges, such as valuing non-market impact, addressing non-marginal changes, accounting for low-probability but high-impact events, and the eternal issue of appropriately discounting the future. A mapping between the characteristics of climate change and traditional economic challenges highlights the difficulties analysts are likely to encounter in conducting BCA. Despite these challenges, the paper argues that the fundamental ability of economic analysis to evaluate alternatives and tradeoffs is vital to decision making. Climate-related decisions span a wide range in terms of their scope, complexity, and depth, and for many applications of economic analyses the issues associated with climate change are tractable. In other cases it may require improved economic techniques or taking steps to ensure uncertainty is more fully addressed. Augmenting economic analysis with distribution analysis or an account of physical effects, and exploring how economic benefit and cost estimates can be incorporated into broader decision making frameworks have also been suggested. The paper concludes that there are opportunities for BCA to play a key role in informing climate change decision-making.

Keywords: adaptation; benefit cost analysis; climate change; efficiency; equity; impacts; welfare economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9001 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:347-376:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jbca/html

DOI: 10.1515/jbca-2014-9001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis is currently edited by Glenn C. Blomquist and William H. Hoy

More articles in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().