Wrong opinions of Dead Men? On the relevance of the history of economic thought for modern economics – A plea for the history of economic thought

Pierenkemper Toni

Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, 2012, vol. 53, issue 2, 239-249

Abstract: Over the last 250 years economic thinking has undergone considerable changes. This article gives a brief overview of major developments and their respective representations within this scientific field. It then elaborates on the fact that the development of these different opinions – or approaches – is mainly due to changing historical circumstances. Economists try to solve contemporary problems; their aims, objects, and methods vary accordingly. However, this does not affect the relevance traditional approaches might have for modern economics. They can indeed prove to be very helpful in tackling today’s economic problems, if economists manage to adjust them to actual circumstances. Within the history of economic thought those traditional concepts are preserved and assembled to enable contemporary scientists to learn from the past.

Keywords: Economics; History of Economic Thought; History of Economic Doctrine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.2012.0021 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:53:y:2012:i:2:p:239-249:n:10

DOI: 10.1524/jbwg.2012.0021

Access Statistics for this article

Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook is currently edited by Dieter Ziegler

More articles in Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().