EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparison of the Robustness of Several Tests of Short Memory to Autocorrelated Errors

Amsler Christine () and Schmidt Peter ()
Additional contact information
Amsler Christine: Michigan State University
Schmidt Peter: Michigan State University

Journal of Econometric Methods, 2012, vol. 1, issue 1, 56-66

Abstract: In this paper we consider the robustness to error autocorrelation of four stationarity tests. The size and power properties of these tests are investigated by simulation. Size is improved by using fixed-b critical values to account for the number of lags used in long-run variance estimation. Lo’s MR/S test is not very robust. Choi’s LM test has excellent robustness properties but this comes at some cost in power; it is not as powerful as the KPSS test or the rescaled variance (V/S) test.

Keywords: stationarity; short memory; robustness. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/2156-6674.1002 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jecome:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:56-66:n:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jem/html

DOI: 10.1515/2156-6674.1002

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Econometric Methods is currently edited by Tong Li and Zhongjun Qu

More articles in Journal of Econometric Methods from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bpj:jecome:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:56-66:n:3