EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inference with Difference-in-Differences Revisited

Mike Brewer, Thomas Crossley () and Joyce Robert
Additional contact information
Joyce Robert: Institute for Fiscal Studies, London WC1E 7AE, UK

Journal of Econometric Methods, 2018, vol. 7, issue 1, 16

Abstract: A growing literature on inference in difference-in-differences (DiD) designs has been pessimistic about obtaining hypothesis tests of the correct size, particularly with few groups. We provide Monte Carlo evidence for four points: (i) it is possible to obtain tests of the correct size even with few groups, and in many settings very straightforward methods will achieve this; (ii) the main problem in DiD designs with grouped errors is instead low power to detect real effects; (iii) feasible GLS estimation combined with robust inference can increase power considerably whilst maintaining correct test size – again, even with few groups, and (iv) using OLS with robust inference can lead to a perverse relationship between power and panel length.

Keywords: cluster robust; difference in differences; feasible GLS; hypothesis test; power (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C13 C21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2017-0005 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
Working Paper: Inference with Difference-in-Differences Revisited (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jecome:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:16:n:9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jem/html

DOI: 10.1515/jem-2017-0005

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Econometric Methods is currently edited by Tong Li and Zhongjun Qu

More articles in Journal of Econometric Methods from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:bpj:jecome:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:16:n:9